Arizona statute
A.R.S. § 13-3110 — Misconduct involving simulated explosive devices; classification; definition
Current through 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session (2025)
Part of Chapter 31: Weapons and Explosives, Arizona Revised Statutes.
Criminal charges under this statute
Full text of A.R.S. § 13-3110
Statutory text current through the 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session (2025). This publication reproduces the official statutory text published by the Arizona Legislature (Arizona Legislative Council compilation, azleg.gov); it is not the official statutes of the State of Arizona.
A. A person commits misconduct involving simulated explosive devices by intentionally giving or sending to another person or placing in a private or public place a simulated explosive device with the intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten or harass.
B. The placing or sending of a simulated explosive device without written notice attached to the device in a conspicuous place that the device has been rendered inert and is possessed for the purpose of curio or relic collection, display or other similar purpose is prima facie evidence of intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten or harass.
C. Misconduct involving simulated explosive devices is a class 5 felony.
D. For the purposes of this section, "simulated explosive device" means a simulation of a prohibited weapon described in section 13-3101, subsection A, paragraph 8, subdivision (a), item (i), (v) or (vii) that a reasonable person would believe is such a prohibited weapon.
Official sources
Legal terms used in this section
Questions this section answers
Is misconduct involving simulated explosive devices a felony or a misdemeanor in Arizona?
Misconduct involving simulated explosive devices is a Class 5 Felony in Arizona under A.R.S. § 13-3110.
Which Arizona statute covers misconduct involving simulated explosive devices?
Misconduct involving simulated explosive devices is governed by A.R.S. § 13-3110 (Misconduct involving simulated explosive devices; classification; definition).
This reference is informational and is not legal advice.