Indiana statute
Ind. Code § 35-37-4-15 — Child molestation; evidence of prior acts
Current through 2026 Regular Session
Part of Chapter 4: Evidence and Protection of Certain Witnesses, Indiana Code.
Full text of Ind. Code § 35-37-4-15
Statutory text current through the 2026 Regular Session. This publication reproduces the official statutory text; it is not the official statutes of the State of Indiana.
Sec. 15. (a) In a prosecution for child molesting under IC 35-42-4-3 , a prosecution for incest under IC 35-46-1-3 , or a prosecution for an attempt or a conspiracy to commit child molesting or incest, evidence that the defendant has committed another crime or act of child molesting or incest or attempted or conspired to commit another crime or act of child molesting or incest: (1) against the same victim; or (2) that involves a similar crime or act of child molesting or incest against a different victim; is admissible. (b) If the state proposes to offer evidence described under subsection (a), the state must disclose the evidence to the defendant, including statements made by witnesses or a summary of the substance of any testimony that is expected to be offered at the defendant's trial: (1) at least fifteen (15) days before the date the defendant's trial is scheduled to begin; or (2) at a later date as determined by the court for good cause. (c) The court shall hold a hearing out of the presence of the jury regarding the admissibility of the evidence described under subsection (a). Even if the court determines that the evidence is relevant, the evidence may be excluded if the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by: (1) the danger of: (A) unfair prejudice; (B) confusion of the issues; or (C) misleading the jury; or (2) considerations of: (A) undue delay; (B) waste of time; or (C) needless presentation of cumulative evidence. However, if the court finds that all or some of the evidence is admissible, the court shall enter an order stating what evidence may be introduced. (d) This section may not be construed to limit the right to introduce evidence at a trial that would otherwise be admissible to prove any of the following: (1) Motive. (2) Opportunity. (3) Intent. (4) Plan. (5) Knowledge. (6) Identity. (7) Absence of mistake or accident.
Official sources
Legal terms used in this section
This reference is informational and is not legal advice.