Skip to main content
US Criminal Defense.org
Menu

South Dakota statute

SDCL § 23A-7-13 — (Rule 11(e)(6)) Evidence of guilty or nolo contendere plea inadmissible after withdrawal--Exception in perjury prosecutions

Current through text effective June 30, 2026 (through the 2025 Regular Session)

Part of Chapter 7: Arraignment And Pleas, South Dakota Codified Laws.

Full text of SDCL § 23A-7-13

Statutory text current through the text effective June 30, 2026 (through the 2025 Regular Session). This publication reproduces the official statutory text; it is not the official statutes of the State of South Dakota.

SDCL § 23A-7-13Primary source, current through the text effective June 30, 2026 (through the 2025 Regular Session)
Except as provided in this section, evidence of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere which was later withdrawn, of an offer to plead guilty or nolo contendere to the crime charged or any other crime, or of statements made in connection with, and relevant to, any of the foregoing pleas or offers, is not admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding against the person who made the plea or offer. However, evidence of a statement made in connection with, and relevant to a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, later withdrawn, or an offer to plead guilty or nolo contendere to the crime charged or any other crime, is admissible in a criminal proceeding for perjury if the statement was made by the defendant under oath, on the record, and in the presence of counsel.

Official sources

Legal terms used in this section

This reference is informational and is not legal advice.